Open Access

Light enhanced bone regeneration in an athymic nude mouse implanted with mesenchymal stem cells embedded in PLGA microspheres

Biomaterials Research201620:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0051-9

Received: 8 September 2015

Accepted: 5 January 2016

Published: 18 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Biodegradable microspheres fabricated from poly (Lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) have attracted considerable attention in the bone tissue regeneration field. In this study, rabbit mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs) adherent to PLGA microspheres were implanted into athymic nude mice and irradiated with 647 nm red light to promote bone formation. It was found that irradiating rMSCs with high levels of red light (647 nm) from an LED (light-emitting diode) increased levels of bone specific markers in rMSCs embedded on PLGA microspheres.

Result

These increased expressions were observed by RT-PCR, real time-QPCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and von Kossa and Alizarin red S staining. Microsphere matrices coated with rMSCs were injected into athymic nude mice and irradiated with red light for 60 seconds showed significantly greater bone-specific phenotypes after 4 weeks in vivo.

Conclusion

The devised PLGA microsphere matrix containing rMSCs and irradiation with red light at 647 nm process shows promise as a means of coating implantable biomedical devices to improve their biocompatibilities and in vivo performances.

Keywords

PLGA microspheres LED rMSCs in vivo transplantation Biomedical devices

Background

Tissue engineering has traditionally used non-reactive synthetic and natural matrices for specific tissue regeneration [13]. However, the fabrication of suitable biocompatible materials creates new opportunities for tissue regeneration in vivo and in vitro in culture systems that mimic the 3D organizations and functional differentiations of tissues. Many researchers in the tissue engineering field have focused on the roles of stem cells [47]. However, although stem cells are capable of differentiating to specific cells and making required tissues, they are problematic in terms of degree of proliferation and multi-lineage differentiation [8]. In order to overcome these shortcomings, many researches have attempted to increase stem cell expansion and differentiation [9, 10].

Recently, laser therapy (LT) has been used to stimulate biologic effects in biological systems and cells. Biomodulation induced by light has been the main subject of several reports over the past few years [1114]. In terms of the application of LT, the wavelength of the light used is thought to specifically stimulate or inhibit actions in cell and tissues. In clinical trials and in vivo, some ranges of wavelength, in particular, red to near IR, were thought be a useful for wound healing [15], peripheral and central nerve regeneration [16], and for the treatment of stomach and duodenal ulcers [17], because such light better penetrates tissues. The several types of cells were found to increase after exposure to low doses of laser irradiation, whereas cell growth and differentiation inhibitory effects were reported at higher doses due to accelerated ATP synthesis in cells [1823] (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1

Schematic view of rMSCs embedded onto PLGA microspheres stimulated by LED irradiation

In the present study, we investigated the use of high doses of laser radiation to increase the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) embedded in PLGA microspheres for bone regeneration in vivo. In the previous study, we examined the effect of light from a red light-emitting diode on osteogenic differentiation of mouse mesenchymal stem cells (D1 cells) which were cultured in the presence of osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) for 3 days, then exposed to a red light-emitting diode (LED) light of 647 nm wavelength once for 10 s, 30 s and 90 s with radiation energies of 0.093 J, 0.279 J and 0.836 J, respectively [24]. This study suggested that osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) cultured in vitro is enhanced by LED light exposure. Laser irradiation of MSCs offers the potential to promote the productions of bone-specific proteins and extracellular matrix, and ultimately the generation of new bone tissue. In this study, we hypothesized that exposing MSCs embedded in a microsphere matrix to radiation emitted by a light emitting diode in vivo might accelerate the differentiation of MSCs into the osteoblast phenotype and facilitate the synthesis of mechanically functional bone.

Methods

Cell harvesting and culture

Rabbit bone marrow stromal cells (rMSCs) were harvested from 3-week-old New Zealand White rabbits, as previously described [25]. In brief, bone marrow (BM) was obtained from the rabbit tibias and femurs via either aspiration or flushing with a 16-gauge needle and a 10-ml syringe containing 1 ml of heparin (3,000 U/ml). After being placed in a 50-ml tube containing 5 ml of low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY), the BM was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 600 g in order to obtain a cell pellet. After the supernatant was removed, the cells were resuspended in 10 ml of low-glucose DMEM containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 % antibiotics, and 105 cells/dish were then plated and cultured in 10-cm dishes at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % CO2 and 95 % air. Non-adherent cells were removed by changing the culture medium after five days of culture. After two weeks of primary culturing, each dish of cells was passaged into three 10-cm culture dishes at seven-day intervals. rMSCs at passage 3 were used in this study. For the cell seeding and growth test, 100 mg of microspheres and 5 × 105 cells/ml of rMSCs were incubated in a Transwell insert in the culture dish, with gentle shaking. After 2 h of incubation, the unattached cells were removed, and the Transwell inset was incubated for cell growth.

Preparation of PLGA microspheres

PLGA microspheres (molecular weight 33,000) were fabricated as an oil-in-water emulsion followed by solvent evaporation, as previously described [26]. In brief, PLGA (4 g) was dissolved in 30 mL of dichloromethane. Using a glass syringe and needle (needle gauge; 20G), the polymer solution was dropped into 300 mL of aqueous solution containing 2 w/v% of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) while mixing, using a magnetic stirrer at 600 rpm. The suspension was then gently stirred for 2 to 3 h at 35 °C with a magnetic stirrer at 600 rpm in order to evaporate the dichloromethane, and the microspheres were collected via 2 min of centrifugation at 1500 rpm. The collected microspheres were washed four times in distilled water, and were then lyophilized. The size of the microspheres, as measured by SEM, ranged between 20 ~ 80 μm.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Philips 535 M) was used to observe the size and morphology of rMSCs. The morphology was observed after gold coating by using a sputter-coater (HUMMER V, Technics, CA). Argon gas pressure was set at 5 psi, and the current was maintained at 10 mA for 5 min. For observing the morphology of cells attached on the PLGA microspheres, the cells were treated with 2.5 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde in PBS and then fixed in 4 °C overnight. Cells attached on the PLGA microsphere surfaces were rinsed with warm PBS for 5 min and immersed for 1 h in 1 % (w/v) osmium tetroxide dissolved in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. After being washed twice in deionized distilled water, the samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 90 %) for 5 min each and were washed three times with 100 % ethanol for 10 min. Ethanol was completely dried by air flow in a clean bench before gold coating.

Nude mouse implantation and LED irradiation

Six-week old Balb/c nude mice were purchased from Clea (Japan). Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of CHA University. PLGA microspheres containing rMSCs were transplanted subcutaneously into the backs of mice, which were either exposed or not exposed to red LED light (n = 18/group). Nude mice were anesthetized using 30 μl of 43 % ketamine-7 % rompun. Red light from a 647-nm diode LED generated at 5 mA and 78 mV was used for the irradiation. Anesthetized mice were irradiated for 60 or 90 seconds in a dark room (the 60 and 90 exposured groups; n = 18/group). After being irradiated mice were kept in a dark room until they had recovered from the anesthetic. At 3 weeks after-treatment, mice were sacrificed (n = 6) by anesthetic overdose, and skin areas included transplanted sites were carefully removed for subsequent biological examination. Photographs of the skin flaps were also taken to record the appearance of tissues around treated sites. The method used is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Observation of SEM images of rMSCs adhesion & proliferation on the PLGA microspheres. a 3 days & b 5 days cultivation

Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) and real time PCR analysis

Total RNA extraction was conducted using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experiment procedures used were performed as previously described [25]. The oligonucleotides used as primers for RT-PCR and real time-QPCR in this study are described in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

PCR primer and product size

Gene

Sequence (5′ → 3′)

Size (bp)

Cycle

Annealing temp.

Ref.

COLI

(S)

AGAACATCACCTACCACTGC

250

35

58 °C

Genebank AY633663

(AS)

ATGTCCAAAGGTGCAATATC

Cbfa-1

(S)

AGAGGTACCAGATGGGACTGTGGTT

316

35

61 °C

Genebank S83370

(AS)

GGTAGCTACTTGGGGAGGATTTGTG

BSP

(S)

CAATAGTGACTCATCCGAAG

280

35

55 °C

Genebank Z46629

(AS)

CTCCTCATCTTATTCATCAC

GAPDH

(S)

TCACAATCTTCCAGGAGCGA

293

35

58 °C

Genebank L23961

(AS)

CACAATGCCGAAGTGGTCGT

Table 2

Real time-qPCR primer and product size

Gene

Sequence (5′ → 3′)

Size (bp)

Cycle

Annealing temp.

Ref.

β-Actin

(S)

ACAGAGCCGCCTCTGCC

124

45

58 °C

Genebank AB009345

(AS)

ACAAGCCTGAGCCGTTGTC

BSP

(S)

ATACCATCTCACACTAGTTATAATG

116

45

58 °C

Genebank NM000493

(AS)

AACAGCATAAAAGTGTTCCTATATC

COLI

(S)

GCAAGAGAGAAAAGAGTGAACC

103

45

58 °C

Genebank AY633663

(AS)

GTGGCTCAAGCAGAACCAG

Cbfa-1

(S)

CAGTCACATCAGGATATCC

117

45

58 °C

Genebank L38480

(AS)

ATGCTGCTGATCTGGAAGA

OCN

(S)

CTCCAGGCACCCATCTTTAC

121

45

58 °C

Genebank NM00095

Western blotting analysis

For Western blotting analysis, the cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA buffer) (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Approximately, 30–50 μg of protein were loaded onto 8-12 % SDS polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were subsequently blocked in 2.5 % skim milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-Tween 20 (0.01 %) and incubated with following primary antibodies: anti-collagen type I (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA), anti-BSP (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-β-actin (Sigma). The blots were visualized by chemiluminescence using Amersham ECL reagents (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).

Histology and immunohistochemical analysis

PLGA microspheres containing rMSCs recovered after 3 weeks in vivo were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS, and incubated for 10 min at room temperature in 1 % Alizarin Red S (Sigma) solution to detect mineralized nodules. For von Kossa staining, fixed and washed cells were incubated in 5 % silver nitrate (Sigma) solution under a 60 W lamp. After 1 h at room temperature, cells were washed in distilled water, and the reaction was stopped by adding 5 % sodium thiosulfate (Sigma) solution for 5 min at room temperature. Finally, cell nuclei were stained by exposure to nuclear fast red (Vector) stain for 3 min. To detect induced proteins, cells were fixed and non-specific epitopes were blocked by incubating them in 2 % BSA for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies.

For ALP (Alkaline phosphase) staining, cells were fixed in citrate-acetone-formaldehyde fixative solution for 30 sec at room temperature and then washed with distilled water. Cells were then incubated for 15 min at room temperature and counter stained with hematoxylin.

For immunohistochemical assays, MSCs embedded in PLGA microsphere sections were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde solution, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin, as previously described [25].

Statistical analyses

The significances of differences between experimental groups were determined using two-tailed Student’s t-test. P-values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Morphology of rMSCs on PLGA microspheres

Three and Seven days after cultivation, rMSCs adhered onto PLGA microspheres and formed proliferated morphology in vitro (Fig. 1a & b). In 3 days, the rMSCs were observed as adhered on PLGA microspheres, while the rMSCs were proliferated and spread on the whole of the PLGA microspheres.

RT-PCR analysis

RT-PCR was used to examine the expressions of the osteogenic markers collagen type I, BSP, and Cbfa1 mRNAs, which are major bone marker proteins. To determine the effect of LED light on osteogenic differentiation, we transplanted rMSCs mixed with PLGA microspheres because the PLGA microspheres support cell proliferation. Collagen type I was strongly expressed in differentiated cells and its expression was enhanced more in the 90 second exposure groups than in the PLGA control group in 1 week and 3 week transplantation except 2 week transplantation (Fig. 2a). In osteogenic-specific genes of BSP, the expressions stimulated by 60 second were strongly expressed in 2 and 3 week transplantation except 1 week transplantation. With Cbfa1 gene expression, 60 second exposure stimulated the gene expression in whole transplantation.
Fig. 2

RT-PCR and Quantitative real-time PCR-based analysis of rMSCs embedded in PLGA microspheres stimulated by LED irradiation. (a): RT-PCR analysis of mRNA expression of cbfa-1, COL-I, BSP, and GAPDH for 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks, (b): Quantitative real-time PCR-based analysis of mRNA expression of cbfa-1, COL-I, BSP, and OCN for 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 weeks

In order to determine quantitatively expression levels, mRNAs were analyzed by real time-QPCR. Figure 2b showed that the levels of BSP (bone sialoprotein), Cbfa1 (Core binding factor alpha 1), and OCN (osteocalcin) in rMSCs in the 60 second exposure groups increased with time, whereas the PLGA control group showed no specific gene expression (Fig. 2B a, b, c, & d). In particular, the expression of OCN mRNA in rMSCs in the 60 second exposure group was much higher than in the PLGA control group. However, collagen type I gene expression was strongly stimulated by 90 seconds in whole transplantation periods (Fig. 2B b).

ALP and DAB (3, 3 -diaminobenzidine) staining analysis

Figure 3a shows ALP and DAB staining findings in the three study groups. The 60 second exposure groups showed higher ALP activities than the PLGA control group after 3 weeks. ALP activity is known to play an important role in the ossification process. Furthermore, ALP activity was significantly higher in 60 second exposure group than in the other two groups; in the 60 second exposure group ALP activity increased with time for two weeks and then leveled off (data not shown).
Fig. 3

Test for osteogenic differentiation of rMSCs transplanted in nude mouse determined by DAB and ALP staining (a), western blotting analysis of β-actin, BSP & collagne type I (b), and ALP release from rMSCs stimulated by LED (c) in vivo. The bar represents 100 μm

The specific proteins, collagen type I and BSP, released by differentiated rMSCs irradiated were examined by western blotting (Fig. 3b). Figure 3b shows that collagen type I release from rMSCs onto PLGA microspheres in the 60 second exposure group was highly expressed, whereas BSP (another bone-specific marker) was not. However, the BSP released from rMSCs stimulated for 60 second was more potent than that of other samples.

To evaluate ALP synthesis more precisely, we attempted to quantify its expression as a means of following osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 3c). Our findings suggest, although some rMSCs in the PLGA control group had osteoblastic characteristics, that ALP was expressed at very low levels by cells in the 90 second exposure and PLGA control groups.

Histologic and immunochemical histologic analysis

In order to confirm the effect of red light on cell proliferation and differentiation, tissue samples from the two groups were hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Alizarin Red S, or von Kossa stained. In terms of cell proliferation, H&E staining showed dense cell distributions in the 60 and 90 second exposure groups (Fig. 4a, b, & c). Three weeks after transplantation, samples of the 60 and 90 second exposure groups showed increased osteogenic cell populations (Fig. 4d, e, & f). However, cells in the PLGA control group were wholly undifferentiated (Fig. 4a, d, & g).
Fig. 4

H & E, Alizarin Red S, and von Kossa staining for osteogenic differentiation of rMSCs embedded onto the PLGA microspheres using LED irradiation. (a), (b), and (c): H & E staining, (d), (e), and (f): Alizarin Red S staining, (g), (h), and (i): von Kossa staining

In this study, we found that LED red light promoted the mineralization of PLGA microspheres by rMSCs, as evidence by von Kossa and Alizarin red S staining of the calcium deposits released by rMSCs. Furthermore, the amount of calcium released by rMSCs in the 60 second exposure group at 3 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 4e & h), were substantially greater than in both the 90 second exposure group and the PLGA control group (Fig. 4d & g).

Immunohistologic assays of collagen type I and BSP

In the 60 second exposure group high levels of collagen type I expression were observed rMSC embedded PLGA microsphere matrices (Fig. 5e & f). However, in PLGA control group no expression of collagen type I was observed. On the other hand, collagen type I expression was smaller in the 90 second exposure group than in the 60 second exposure group (Fig. 5i).
Fig. 5

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of collagen type I (a) and BSP (b) released from rMSCs embedded onto the PLGA microspheres. The bar represents 100 μm

As shown in Fig. 5b, a high levels of BSP expression were also observed when the antibodies to BSP and nuclei was stained with DAPI, in fact, almost all cells in the 60 and 90 second exposure groups stained diffusely positive for BSP (Fig. 5b). However, no BSP was observed in the PLGA control group.

Discussion

Many studies have been focused on maintaining the differentiation potentialities and expand enough cells for clinical trials. As a suitable source for differentiation, low level light irradiation (LLLI) using 630 nm LED could enhance replicative and colony formation potentials of MSCs derived from human bone marrow [27, 28]. Furthermore, MSCs seeded on three-dimensional (3D) biomatrices were irradiated with LLLI. The consequent phenotype modulation and development of MSCs towards ossified tissue was studied in this combined 3D biomatrix/LLLI system and in a control group, which was similarly grown, but was not treated by LLLI [29].

The osteogenesis indicates that stimulation of light energy to the cells is absorbed by intracellular chromophores [30]. Recent study suggested that low-level laser irradiation generates a small amount of singlet oxygen that influences the formation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [31]. Furthermore, laser irradiation may increase the transmembrane electrochemical proton gradient in mitochondria to improve the efficiency of the proton-motive force and generate greater calcium release by an antiport process [32]. A number of different lasers with different wavelengths, including helium-neon (wavelength; 632.8 nm), gallium-aluminum-arsenide (wavelength; 805 ± 25 nm), and gallium-arsenide (wave length; 904 nm), have been used at different intensities and treatment schedules for repairing bone defects. Our findings show that red light treatment of transplanted rMSCs on PLGA microspheres stimulated a cascade of osteogenic events.

Conclusions

Summarizing, our findings suggest that red light laser LED treatment at 647 nm effectively stimulates osteogenic differentiation in rMSCs embedded in PLGA microspheres. It was found that irradiation for 60 seconds increased the mRNA and protein expressions of bone markers, and increased calcium deposition, and cell proliferation and differentiation in vivo. These results indicate that irradiation with red light has direct and indirect effects on the growth of rMSCs embedded in PLGA microsphere constructs and directs cell differentiation during in vivo tissue regeneration.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2015R1A1A3A04000928).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University

References

  1. Nakadate M, Amizuka N, Li M, Freitas PH, Oda K, Nomura S, et al. Histological evaluation on bone regeneration of dental implant placement sites grafted with a self-setting alpha-tricalcium phosphate cement. Division of Oral Anatomy. 2008;71:93–104.Google Scholar
  2. Aho AJ, Rekola J, Matinlinna J, Gunn J, Tirri T, Viitaniemi P, et al. Natural composite of wood as replacement material for ostechondral bone defects. J Applied Biomaterials. 2007;83:64–71.Google Scholar
  3. Fricain JC, Schlaubitz S, Le Visage C, Arnault I, Derkaoui SM, Siadous R, et al. A nano-hydroxyapatite--pullulan/dextran polysaccharide composite macroporous material for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(12):2947–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Park JS, Woo DG, Sun BK, Chung HM, Im SJ, Choi YM, et al. In vitro and in vivo test of PEG/PCL-based hydrogel scaffold for cell delivery application. J Controlled Release. 2007;124:51–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Park K, Park JS, Woo DG, Yang HN, Chung HM, Park KH. The use of chondrogenic differentiation drugs to induce stem cell differentiation using double bead microsphere structure. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2490–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeon SY, Park JS, Yang HN, Lim HJ, Yi SW, Park H, et al. Co-delivery of Cbfa-1-targeting siRNA and SOX9 protein using PLGA nanoparticles to induce chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35(28):8236–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee IC, Wang JH, Lee YT, Young TH. The differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by mechanical stress or/and co-culture system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;352:147–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Grayson WL, Zhao F, Bunnell B, Ma T. Hypoxia enhances proliferation and tissue formation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358:948–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsubara T, Tsutsumi S, Pan H, Hiraoka H, Oda R, Nishimura M, et al. A new technique to expand human mesenchymal stem cells using basement membrane extracellular matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:503–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Al-Watban FAH, Zhang XY. Comparison of wound healing process using argon and krypton lasers. J Clin Laser Med. 1997;15:209–15.Google Scholar
  12. Karu T. Primary and secondary mechanism of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1999;49:1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrnes KR, Wu X, Waynant RW, Ilev IK, Anders JJ. Low power laser irradiation alters gene expression of olfactory ensheathing cells in vitro. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37:161–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kujawa J, Zavodnik L, Zavodnik I, Buko V, Lapshyna A, Bryszewska M. Effect of low-intensity (3.75–.25 J/cm2) near-infrared (810 nm) laser radiation on red blood cell ATPase activities and membrane structure. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2004;22:111–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rezende SB, Ribeiro MS, Núñez SC, Garcia VG, Maldonado EP. Effects of a single near-infrared laser treatment on cutaneous wound healing: Biometrical and histological study in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;87:145–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Snyder SK, Byrnes KR, Borke RC, Sanchez A, Anders JJ. Quantification of calcitonin gene-related peptide mRNA and neuronal cell death in facial motor nuclei following axotomy and 633 nm low power laser treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;31:216–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Karu TI. Molecular mechanism of the therapeutic effect of low intensity laser irradiation. Lasers Life Sci. 1988;2:53–74.Google Scholar
  18. Schaffer M, Sroka R, Fuchs C, Schrader-Reichardt U, Schaffer PM, Busch M, et al. Biomodulative effects induced by 805 nm laser light irradiation of normal and tumor cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1997;40:253–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ocana-Quero JM, Dela Lastra JP, Gomez-Villamandos R, Moreno-Millan M. Biological effect of helium–neon (He–Ne) laser irradiation on mouse myeloma (Sp2-Ag14) cell line in vitro. Lasers Med Sci. 1988;13:214–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Pal G, Dutta A, Mitra K, Grace MS, Amat A, Romanczyk TB, et al. Effect of low intensity laser interaction with human skin fibroblast cells using fiber-optic nano-probes. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;86:252–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lubart R, Wollman Y, Friedman H, Rochkind S, Laulicht I. Effects of visible and near-infrared lasers on cell culture. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1992;12:305–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilf R, Murant RS, Narayanan U, Gibson SL. Relationship of mitochondrial function and cellular adenosine triphosphate levels to hematoporphyrin derivative induced photosensitization in R3230AC mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 1986;46:211–7.Google Scholar
  23. Manteifel V, Bakccva L, Karu T. Ultrastructure changes chondriome of human lymphocytes after irradiation of He–. Ne laser: appearance of giant mitochondria. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1997;38:25–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim HK, Kim JH, Abbas AA, Kim DO, Park SJ, Chung JY, et al. Red light of 647 nm enhances osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:214–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Park JS, Woo DG, Yang HN, Chung HM, Park KH. Heparin-bound transforming growth factor- β 3 enhances neocartilage formation by rabbit mesenchymal stem cells. Transplantation. 2008;85:589–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Park JS, Park K, Woo DG, Yang HN, Chung HM, Park KH. PLGA microsphere construct coated with TGF-β 3 loaded nanoparticles for neocartilage formation. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:2162–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Kwong DL, Chan GC. The effects of various irradiation doses on the growth and differentiation of marrow-derived human mesenchymal stromal cells. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;211:349–53.Google Scholar
  28. Tuby H, Maltz L, Oron U. Low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) promotes proliferation of mesenchymal and cardiac stem cells in culture. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(4):373–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Abramovitch-Gottlib L, Gross T, Naveh D, Geresh S, Rosenwaks S, Bar I, et al. Low level laser irradiation stimulates osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells seeded on a three-dimensional biomatrix. Lasers Med Sci. 2005;20:138–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedmann H, Lubart R, Laulicht I. A possible explanation of laser-induced stimulation and damage of cell cultures. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1991;11:87–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Amat A, Rigau J, Waynant RW, Ilev IK, Tomas J, Anders JJ. Modification of the intrinsic fluorescence and the biochemical behavior of ATP after irradiation with visible and near-infrared laser light. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005;81:26–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mochizuki-Oda N, Kataoka Y, Cui Y, Yamada H, Heya M, Awazu K. Effects of near-infra-red laser irradiation on adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate contents of rat brain tissue. Neurosci Lett. 2005;323:207–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Park and Park. 2016

Advertisement