Skip to main content

Effect of chitooligosaccharide on the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease



The main protease (Mpro) is a crucial target for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Chitooligosaccharide (CS) has broad-spectrum antiviral activity and can effectively inhibit the activity of SARS-CoV. Here, based on the high homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, this study explores the effect and mechanism of CS with various molecular weights on the activity of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.


We used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), UV–Vis, synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy, circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and computational simulation to investigate the molecular interaction and the interaction mechanism between CS and SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.


Four kinds of CS with different molecular weights significantly inhibited the activity of Mpro by combining the hydrogen bonding and the salt bridge interaction to form a stable complex. Glu166 appeared to be the key amino acid. Among them, chitosan showed the highest inhibition effect on Mpro enzyme activity and the greatest impact on the spatial structure of protein. Chitosan would be one of the most potential anti-viral compounds.


This study provides the theoretical basis to develop targeted Mpro inhibitors for the screening and application of anti-novel coronavirus drugs.


Pneumonia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a long incubation period and high infectivity, poses a great threat to public health worldwide [1, 2]. Currently, antiviral drugs such as ribavirin and ritonavir, which are used to treat patients with atypical pneumonia like SARS, are used to treat patients with new coronary pneumonia, which have obvious adverse side-effects and drug resistance. Antiviral drugs are known to cause high replication rates, which result in the viral resistant, weaken the host immune system, and only specifically inhibit a small proportion of the virus [3,4,5]. There is an urgent need to develop safe, effective and inexpensive potential targeted therapeutic drugs with low or minimal toxicity. The main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively investigated as a druggable target for COVID-19 due to its critical role in viral replication and transcription [6]. Mpro hydrolyzes polyproteins from multiple conserved sites, resulting in a variety of nonstructural proteins, such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and helicases, for assembly into new viruses. At the same time, Mpro also has a highly conserved substrate specificity, which is characterized by efficient cleavage in peptide fragments, including [(Leu, Phe, Met, Val)-Gln↓(Ser, Ala, Gly)] sequence (cleavage site indicated with ↓) [7]. The critical role of Mpro in the infection process and the highly conserved substrate specificity make it an important research target for SARS-CoV-2. There have been great efforts to find SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors as potential drugs for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 [8, 9].

Chitosan is the unique known natural alkaline cationic polymer, which widely exists in marine crustaceans, and has the characteristics of excellent biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, biodegradability and broad-spectrum antiviral activity [10,11,12]. Chitosan has anti—Avian influenza A (H7N9) activity and its intranasal delivery can effectively activate mucosal immune responses, resulting in the increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in bronchial and lung tissues [13]. Chitosan and its derivatives also have antiviral effects on the SARS-CoV-2, and can prevent and treat respiratory diseases caused by the virus without unnecessary toxic side effects. Chitosan occupies a unique position among natural polymers due to its antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. It can inhibit the growth of various bacteria and fungi, and can also enhance the antiviral immune response [14]. It has been recently reported that β-chitosan prevents the attachment of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, and β-chitosan can effectively attach to SARS-CoV-2 RBD or ACE2, blocking the binding of RBD to ACE2 for the reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection [15,16,17]. These results provide us with new ideas and confidence to explore the effect and mechanism of CS with various molecular weights on the enzymatic activity of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.

On the basis of the high homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, we took SARS-CoV-2 Mpro as the research target and systematically investigated the effect of CS on the enzymatic activity of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro [18]. The interaction between CS and SARS-CoV-2 Mpro was studied by FRET, UV–Vis spectrometry, synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and molecular docking technology. In addition, we explored the interaction mechanism of CS and Mpro. It will provide a theoretical basis for the application of CS to anti-SARS-CoV-2 and provide a new idea for the screening and application of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs.

Materials and methods


Ni2+ HisTrap prepacked column was obtained from GE healthcare. CS standards were purchased from Qingdao BZ Oligo Biotech company. SARS-CoV-2 Mpro activity fluorescence detection kit was obtained from Beyotime. Modified bradford method protein concentration determination kit was purchased from Shanghai Sangon.

Protein expression and purification

Sequences encoding the domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (UniProtKB accession P0DTD1, residues 3264–3569) were optimized for the synthesis by WuHan Genecreat Biological Engineering [19]. We used the previously reported cloning strategy to produce authentic viral Mpro. A pET28a plasmid containing the SARS-CoV-2 his-tagged Mpro sequence was transformed into BL21 (DE3) Gold E. coli strain. Bacterial cultures were grown in 250 mL of LB/kana (Sangon, Shanghai, China, 100 μg/mL) media at 37C overnight with gentle shaking. Then, 1 L of LB/kana (100 μg/mL) was inoculated and incubated under the same condition until reaching OD = 0.6–0.8 at a wavelength of 600 nm and 0.5 mM of IPTG (Sangon, Shanghai, China) was added to the cell culture to induce the expression at 37C. After 4 h, the cells were collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 6,000 × g (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The cell pellets were resuspended in PBS containing bacterial protein preparation lysate (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Cell rupture was achieved by sonication (Scientz, Ningbo, China) in ice. To remove cellular debris, the extract was centrifuged at 4C and 12,000 rpm for 30 min and filtered through a 0.22 μm-pore membrane. The supernatant was loaded onto Ni–NTA affinity column and eluted in an imidazole 20–500 mM gradient. The purified Mpro was stored in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.3, 2 mM β-ME).

SARS-CoV-2 Mpro enzyme inhibition assay

FRET protease assay was performed to measure the inhibitory activity of compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The fluorogenic substrate (MCA-AVLQSGFR-Lys(Dnp)-Lys-NH2) was synthesized by Beyotime (Shanghai, China). The FRET-based protease assay was performed as follows [20]. The recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (1.5 µM at a final concentration) was mixed with serial dilutions of each CS in 80 µL assay buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.3, 1 mM EDTA) and incubated for 10 min. The reaction was initiated by adding 2 µL fluorogenic substrate with a final concentration of 20 µM. After that, the fluorescence signal at 320 nm (excitation) / 405 nm (emission) was immediately measured with a Thermo Varioskan LUX 3020–213 plate reader. Three independent experiments were performed. All experimental data were analyzed by using the GraphPad Prism software.

UV–vis absorption

UV–vis spectra were determined according to the previous report [21]. Mpro (1.0 × 10−5 M) solution and CS solution (5.0 × 10−3 M) were used in the fluorescence experiment. The buffer used in the fluorescence experiment was 50 mM phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4). In the UV–vis spectra assay, Mpro was kept constant while varying the concentration of CS.

Fluorescence experiment

The synchronous fluorescence spectra of Mpro (1.0 × 10−5 M) solution and CS solution were obtained with a FP-6500 (JASCO, Japan) fluorescence spectrophotometer as reported elsewhere [22]. The Δλ was set to 20 nm and the scan range was set to 220–690 nm. The buffer used in the fluorescence experiment was same with that of UV.

Circular dichroism measurement

The far-UV CD measurements were performed with a J-810 spectrometer (JASCO, Japan) at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere with a band width of 1 nm. The concentrations of protein and CS were kept constant to ensure that the molar ratio of CS to protein was 1:10. The CD measurements of Mpro in the presence and absence of CS were made in the range of 200–250 nm. The CD result was expressed as a molar ellipticity, ([Θ]) in deg cm2 dmol−1, as defined below:

$$\left[\Theta\right]=\frac{\Theta_{\mathrm{obs}}}{10nlC_{\mathrm p}}$$

where obs is the CD in millidegree, n is the number of amino acid residues (306), l is the path length of the cell (0.1 cm), and Cp is the mole fraction. The helical content could be calculated from the [Θ] values at 208 nm using the following equation [23]:

$$\mathrm{\alpha }-\mathrm{helix\%}=\frac{{-\left[\Theta \right]}_{208}-4000}{33000-4000}\times 100$$

Molecular docking

Docking-based virtual screening: The 2.16 Å crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro was extracted from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 6LU7) [24, 25]. The enzyme structure and ligand were subjected to an energy minimization step using the OPLS-2005 force-field. Molecular-docking was based on the docking protocols of Glide, followed by “Extra-Precision” mode (XP). The input compounds were assessed by using the docking-based virtual screening and filtered to final four optimized lead compounds based on the Glide-Gscores.

Alanine Scanning: Using the alanine scan in Schrödinger software, Glu166 was mutated to Ala166, the structure of the mutant protein was modeled, and the effect of Glu166 on the complex was explored with changes in the affinity.


Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro by CS

FRET has been widely used to study the interaction between small molecules and enzymes [26, 27]. First, using the fluorescent chromophore and the highly conserved substrate specificity of protease, we investigated the effect of adding CS on Mpro enzyme activity. Figure 1 shows the effect of various concentrations of CS on the enzymatic activity of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. The results showed that all of the four different molecular weights of CS at the concentrations of 25, 50 and 100 μM showed the inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, and the inhibition rate of chitotriose was significantly higher than that of other CS. Especially, when the concentration of chitotriose was 100 μM, the enzyme inhibition rate reached 55%. The inhibition of Mpro enzyme activity might be attributed to the combination of CS with the active site of Mpro, which changed the conformation of Mpro and interacted to form a complex. In order to explain the change of enzyme activity, a series of spectroscopic experiments and computer simulations were used to study the change of Mpro after the addition of CS.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The inhibitory effect of chitooligosaccharides such as chitobiose, chitotriose, chitotetraose, and chitosan

UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy

The change in the UV–Vis absorption spectrum is caused by the formation of complexes [28]. UV–Vis absorption spectra can visualize the structural change of Mpro upon the complex formation with CS. Figure 2 shows the UV absorption spectra for the interaction between CS with various molecular weights and Mpro. Figure 2 shows that there are 4 curves: Mpro (curve a), CS with a different molecular weight (curve b), a mixture of Mpro and CS (curve c), the subtraction of CS from the mixed solution (curve d). Due to the transition of valence electrons, Mpro has a strong absorption peak at 280 nm, which is mainly generated by the π-π* transition of the benzene ring of the aromatic amino acid residue of Mpro. From the comparison of curves a and d, it can be found that the strong absorption peak of Mpro at 280 nm has been significantly changed by the addition of CS, indicating that the addition of CS changes the conformation of Mpro and the microenvironment around the aromatic amino acids. The scanning results of UV–Vis spectra confirmed the interaction between CS and Mpro. It shows that the addition of CS changes the conformation of Mpro, affects the microenvironment of aromatic amino acid residues, and then affects the enzymatic activity of Mpro.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The absorption spectra of chitooligosaccharides bound to Mpro

Fluorescence quenching

Synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy has been used to characterize the interaction of small molecules with proteins on the secondary structure, and to reflect the microenvironment information of protein fluorophores [22]. Under a specific Δλ, as other proteins, the aromatic amino acid residues of Mpro can emit endogenous fluorescence, which is often used as an effective indicator of protein structural changes. Figure 3 shows the effect of various molecular weights CS on the fluorescence emission spectrum of Mpro.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The fluorescence spectra of Mpro in the presence of chitooligosaccharides (pH = 7.4, λex = 288 nm). In the figure, a to f represent chitooligosaccharides at concentrations of 0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 × 10−4 mol/L, respectively

When the excitation wavelength is 288 nm, Mpro has a strong fluorescence at 330 nm. With increasing concentration of CS, the fluorescence intensity of Mpro gradually decreased, because the interaction of CS and Mpro made the conformational change of Mpro. The microenvironment of tyrosine residues resulted in the quenching of Mpro's endogenous fluorescence. Synchronous fluorescence spectra also proved the interaction between CS and Mpro, indicating that the addition of CS changed the conformation of Mpro, changed the microenvironment of tyrosine residues, and then possibly affected the Mpro enzyme activity. The results were well matched with that of UV–Vis.

Circular dichroism

CD is commonly used to characterize the structure of proteins, especially for the determination of conformational changes and alterations in secondary structure [29, 30]. The interaction of CS and Mpro can cause changes in the protein structure. The structural changes of CS on Mpro were explored by CD. Figure 4 shows the CD spectra of CS and Mpro. The CD spectrum of Mpro showed two distinct negative peaks at 208 and 220 nm, which was the typical of α-helix and consistent with the crystal structure. After the addition of CS, the amplitude of the negative peak was lowered, indicating that the helical structure of Mpro was affected, but the shape of the peak did not change and the α-helix was still the main secondary structure of Mpro.

Fig. 4
figure 4

CD spectra in the absence and presence of chitooligosaccharides. The lower spectrum represents Mpro and the upper spectrum represents Mpro-chitooligosaccharides

The effect of CS on the conformation of Mpro can be determined according to the changes in the protein α-helix, β-sheet and random coil contents. In this study, to further explore the effect of four CS on the spatial structure of Mpro, we calculated the α-helix content of the four compounds. The calculated content of α-helix in Mpro with and without chitobiose was 45.7% and 40.4%, respectively, and the addition of chitobiose reduced the content of Mpro α-helix by about 5%. At the same time, as described in Table 1, it was found that the content of α-helix in Mpro was reduced to different degrees after the addition of four CS, respectively. Among them, chitotriose had the greatest effect on the structure of Mpro, and the content of α-helix decreased by 11.8%. CD showed that the four kinds of CS interacted with Mpro, and the partial arrangement of Mpro led to the loosening and reduction of the α-helix structure, which changed the spatial structure of Mpro, and then possibly inhibited the enzymatic activity of Mpro. In order to study the mechanism of action of the complex in more detail, we carried out the computational simulation for molecular docking in the following.

Table 1 The effect of chitooligosaccharides on Mpro α-helix

Molecular docking

The molecular interaction between Mpro and CS in the key amino acids was further explored by computational simulation. Molecular docking refers to the use of computers to simulate the mechanism of action of small molecule ligands and protein receptors in a fixed network lattice, providing a theoretical background for the subsequent experiments [31]. CS with various molecular weights (chitobiose, chitotriose, chitotetraose, and chitopentaose) were used as ligands and Mpro was used as the receptor for the molecular docking. Figure 5 shows the optimal docking conformation, which reveals the CS with different molecular weights have been inserted into the active site of Mpro and interacted with amino acid residues (such as Thr, Glu, His, Ser, etc.). The docking scores and specific amino acid residues are described in Table 2. The results showed that all of chitobiose, chitotriose, chitotetraose and chitopentaose had hydrogen bonding interactions with Mpro protein, and the hydrogen bonding was an important force to maintain the stability of CS and Mpro complex. At the same time, chitobiose and chitotriose can also interact with Mpro via salt bridge, which is also very critical for the stability of the complex. By comparison, it was found that chitosan had the highest docking score, probably because it contained more hydroxyl groups and could form a more stable complex with Mpro. It is worth of noting here that the Mpro amino acid Glu166 interacts with chitobiose, chitotriose, chitotetraose, and chitopentaose. Glu166 is also a key amino acid in the structure of Mpro, which plays a key role in maintaining the structural stability. It is preliminarily speculated that Glu166 plays an important role in stabilizing the binding of CS to Mpro. To explore the important role of Glu166 on the affinity of CS-Mpro complexes, we carried out alanine scanning in the following.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The molecular modeling for the interaction between Mpro and chitooligosaccharides (CS). A Mpro is represented in the solid ribbon. B CS is displayed in a stick model and amino acid residues are displayed in the line model. The dotted yellow line denotes hydrogen bonding and the dotted purple line denotes salt-bridge

Table 2 The interaction between Mpro and chitooligosaccharides

Alanine scanning

Key amino acids play an important role in the formation of protein–ligand complexes and affect the affinity of the complexes [32]. Molecular docking showed that Glu166 as a key amino acid was involved in the formation of hydrogen bonds and salt bridge interactions for the interaction between CS and Mpro. To verify the effect of Glu166 on the affinity of the complex, Glu166 was mutated to Ala166 by alanine scanning. Figure 6 shows the alanine scanning results. The affinity of mutated Mpro with the four CS was reduced, indicating that Glu166 was the key amino acid of Mpro and played a key role in the structure. Furthermore, the Glu166 mutation had the greatest effect on the affinity of the CS-Mpro complex. In addition to forming multiple hydrogen bonds, the negatively charged carboxyl group of Glu166 can form a salt bridge with the amino group of chitotriose. In a word, the mutation of Glu166 to Ala166 might be the reason for the sudden change of affinity.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The affinity changes by E166A mutation in chitooligosaccharides

The Mpro structure has a Cys-His catalytic dyad with a substrate-binding site located in the cleft between domain I (residues 8–101) and domain II (residues 102–184). The amino acid Glu166 of Mpro locates in this gap, and is in an antiparallel sheet in the structure, which is involved in the formation of key sites. The position of Glu166 is particularly sensitive and the affinity of the complex changes significantly after mutation. Glu166, as the key amino acid for Mpro binding, can be used as a new target for the development of target-specific Mpro inhibitors.


A variety of carbohydrate polymers including hyaluronate (HA) and chitosan have been widely investigated for drug delivery applications [33,34,35]. Especially, HA has been used for liver targeting, ocular and transdermal drug delivery applications [33]. In addition, chitosan has been used for oral drug delivery applications with strong interaction to the tight junction of intestines [35]. In this study, the interaction and action mechanism of CS to targeting SARS-CoV-2 Mpro were investigated by enzymatic activity analysis, spectroscopy and computational simulation. The recombinant protein SARS-CoV-2 Mpro was successfully purified via prokaryotic expression. Four kinds of CS reduced the enzymatic activity in a concentration-dependent manner, and chitotriose showed a significant inhibitory effect on the Mpro enzymatic activity. Various spectroscopic studies have shown that all four CS can interact with Mpro. CS can change the microenvironment of Mpro amino acid residues, thereby affecting the spatial structure of Mpro and the activity of Mpro enzyme. Chitosan had the greatest impact on the spatial structure of protein. Chitotriose might be the most potential antiviral compound. The complexes were mainly formed by hydrogen bonds and salt bridges to form stable complexes. At the same time, Glu166, as a key amino acid, played an important role in maintaining the Mpro-CS complex, which would be used as a target for Mpro inhibitors, providing a new direction for the development of targeted Mpro inhibitors. Further experiments will be carried out to investigate the effect of CS on the anti-SARS-CoV-2.


On the basis of the high homology between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, this study took SARS-CoV-2 Mpro as the research target to investigate the effect of CS with various molecular weights on the activity of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and the interaction between them. The results showed that four kinds of CS with different molecular weights could reduce the activity of Mpro and form stable complexes with Mpro through hydrogen bond and salt bridge interaction. In this interaction, Glu166 appeared to be the key amino acid. This study provides a theoretical basis for the development of targeted Mpro inhibitors, and provides a new idea for the screening and application of anti-novel coronavirus drugs.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Angiotensin converting enzyme-2


Circular dichroism


Coronavirus disease 2019




Fluorescence resonance energy transfer


Main protease


Receptor-binding domain


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus


  1. Yu MA, Shen AK, Ryan MJ, Boulanger LL. Coordinating COVID-19 vaccine deployment through the WHO COVID-19 Partners Platform. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2021;99:171-171A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu RJ, Zhao X, Li J, Niu PH, Yang B, Wu HL. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abian O, Ortega-Alarcon D, Jimenez-Alesanco A, Ceballos-Laita L, Vega S, Reyburn HT. Structural stability of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and identification of quercetin as an inhibitor by experimental screening. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:1693–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson CB, Farzan M, Chen B, Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;2021(23):3–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kneller DW, Phillips G, O’Neill HM, Jedrzejczak R, Stols L, Langan P. Structural plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 3CL Mpro active site cavity revealed by room temperature X-ray crystallography. Nat Commun. 2021;23:3202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Su H, Yao S, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Liu J, Shao Q. Identification of pyrogallol as a warhead in design of covalent inhibitors for the SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3623.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiong Y, Zhu GH, Zhang YN, Hu Q, Wang HN, Yu HN. Flavonoids in Ampelopsis grossedentata as covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro: Inhibition potentials, covalent binding sites and inhibitory mechanisms. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:967–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong Y, Dai T, Wei Y, Zhang L, Zheng M, Zhou F. A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao LQ, Xu J, Chen SD. In Silico Screening of Potential Chinese Herbal Medicine Against COVID-19 by Targeting SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme II Using Molecular Docking. Chin J Integr Med. 2020;26:527–32.

  10. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Shafi ME, Zabermawi NM, Arif M, Batiha GE, Khafaga AF. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chitosan and its derivatives and their applications: A review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:2726–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarmila V, Vavríková E. Chitosan derivatives with antimicrobial, antitumour and antioxidant activities–a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:3596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ai H, Wang F, Xia Y, Chen X, Lei C. Antioxidant, antifungal and antiviral activities of chitosan from the larvae of housefly. Musca domestica L Food Chem. 2012;132:493–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng M, Qu D, Wang H, Sun Z, Liu X, Chen J. Intranasal Administration of Chitosan Against Influenza A (H7N9) Virus Infection in a Mouse Model. Sci Rep. 2016;29:28729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan, R. S. L., Hassandarvish, P., Chee, C. F., Chan, L. W., Wong, T. W. Chitosan and its derivatives as polymeric anti-viral therapeutics and potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 nanomedicine. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2022;290:119500.

  15. He X, Xing R, Li K, Qin Y, Zou P, Liu S. Beta-chitosan extracted from Loligo Japonica for a potential use to inhibit Newcastle disease. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;82:614–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iravani S, Varma RS. Important Roles of Oligo-and Polysaccharides against SARS-CoV-2: Recent Advances. Appl Sci. 2021;11:3512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davydova, V. N., Nagorskaia, V. P., Gorbach, V. I., Kalitnik, A. A., Reunov, A. V., Solov'eva, T. F. Chitosan antiviral activity: Dependence on structure and depolymerization method. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2021;7:103–108.

  18. Hubbard RE. Structure-based drug discovery and protein targets in the CNS. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60:7–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, Z., Du, X., Xu, Y., Deng, Y., Liu, M., Zhao, Y. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020;582:289–293.

  20. Li H, Xu F, Liu C, Cai A, Dain JA, Li D. Inhibitory Effects and Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Binding Affinities of Dietary Hydrolyzable Tannins and Their Gut Microbial Metabolites on SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:12197–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang N, Han X, Li J, Wang Y, Yu W, Wang R. Comparative study of the bindings between 3-phenyl-1H-indazole and five proteins by isothermal titration calorimetry, spectroscopy and docking methods. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019;37:4580–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Han X, Wang N, Li J, Wang Y, Wang R, Chang J. Identification of nafamostat mesilate as an inhibitor of the fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) demethylase activity. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;297:80–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Daneshgar P, Moosavi-Movahedi AA, Norouzi P, Ganjali MR, Madadkar-Sobhani A, Saboury AA. Molecular interaction of human serum albumin with paracetamol: spectroscopic and molecular modeling studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2009;45:129–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fakhar Z, Khan S, Alomar SY. ABBV-744 as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease enzyme against COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2020;11:234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020;582:289–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mu J, Liu F, Rajab MS, Shi M, Li S, Goh C, Lu L, Xu Q-H, Liu B, Ng LG, Xing B. A small-molecule FRET reporter for the real-time visualization of cell-surface proteolytic enzyme functions. Angew Chem. 2014;53:14357–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kao RY, To AP, Ng LW, Tsui WH, Lee TS. Characterization of SARS-CoV main protease and identification of biologically active small molecule inhibitors using a continuous fluorescence-based assay. FEBS Lett. 2004;576:325–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajendiran N, Thulasidhasan J. Interaction of sulfanilamide and sulfamethoxazole with bovine serum albumin and adenine: spectroscopic and molecular docking investigations. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015;144:183–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Arumugam SS, Subramanian N, Malaichamy I. New insights into the dimerization and site-specific cooperative interaction of Azure B with model transport proteins by spectroscopic and computational studies. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016;164:212–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ajmal, M. R., Nusrat, S., Alam, P., Zaidi, N., Khan, M. V., Zaman, M. Interaction of anticancer drug clofarabine with human serum albumin and human α-1 acid glycoprotein. Spectroscopic and molecular docking approach. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2017;135:106–115.

  31. Xiong Y, Zhu GH, Zhang YN. Flavonoids in Ampelopsis grossedentata as covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro: Inhibition potentials, covalent binding sites and inhibitory mechanisms. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:976–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Javanmardi K, Chou CW, Terrace C. Rapid characterization of spike variants via mammalian cell surface display. Mol Cell. 2021;81:5099–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Oh EJ, Park K, Kim KS, Kim J, Yang J, Kong J, Lee MY, Hoffman AS, Hahn SK. Target specific and long-acting delivery of protein, peptide, and nucleotide therapeutics using hyaluronic acid derivatives. J Control Rel. 2010;141:2–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim SJ, Han HH, Hahn SK, Hyaluronate - black phosphorus conjugates as a copper chelating agent for Wilson disease treatment, Biomaterials Research. 2021;25:20.l.

  35. Cánepa C, Imperiale JC, Berini CA, Lewicki M, Sosnik A, Biglione MM. Development of a drug delivery system based on chitosan nanoparticles for oral administration of interferon-α. Biomacromol. 2017;18:3302–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Dalian Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project [grant number 2021JJ13SN62]. This research was financially supported by the Basic Science Research Program (2020R1A2C3014070) of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea.


This work was supported by the grant code: 2021JJ13SN62 and 2020R1A2C3014070.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Q.W. and Y.S. contributed towards the conception and design of this study, acquisition of data, analysis and drafting of the article. S.K.H., G.J., M.K. conceived of the study, designed the study, coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sei Kwang Hahn or Ge Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The manuscript has been submitted with the consent of all authors for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Song, Y., Kim, M. et al. Effect of chitooligosaccharide on the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Biomater Res 27, 13 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Mpro
  • Chitooligosaccharide
  • Spectroscopy
  • Molecular docking