Open Access

Effects of poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) and magnesium hydroxide additives on physico-mechanical properties and degradation of poly(L-lactic acid)

  • Eun Young Kang1, 2,
  • Eugene Lih1,
  • Ik Hwan Kim2,
  • Yoon Ki Joung1, 3 and
  • Dong Keun Han1, 3Email author
Biomaterials Research201620:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0054-6

Received: 11 January 2016

Accepted: 26 February 2016

Published: 15 March 2016

Abstract

Background

Biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is one of the most widely used polymer in biomedical devices, but it still has limitations such as inherent brittleness and acidic degradation products. In this work, PLLA blends with poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) and Mg(OH)2 were prepared by the thermal processing to improve their physico-mechanical and thermal properties. In addition, the neutralizing effect of Mg(OH)2 was evaluated by degradation study.

Results

The elongation of PLLA remarkably increased from 3 to 164.4 % and the glass transition temperature (Tg) of PLLA was slightly reduced from 61 to 52 °C by adding PLCL additive. Mg(OH)2 in polymeric matrix not only improved the molecular weight reduction and mechanical strength of PLLA, but also neutralized the acidic byproducts generated during polyester degradation.

Conclusions

Therefore, the results demonstrated that the presence of PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives in PLLA matrix could prevent the thermal decomposition and control degradation behavior of polyester.

Keywords

Poly(L-lactic acid) Poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) Magnesium hydroxide Thermal decomposition Neutralization

Background

Poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) has excellent mechanical properties, thermal plasticity, and transparency, which is a renewably derived thermoplastic and biodegradable polyester extensively investigated over the last several decades [13]. However, a few drawbacks of PLLA including inherent brittleness, poor melt strength, and imperfect biocompatibility have limited numerous applications in biomedical science and engineering such as implant devices, tissue scaffolds, and internal sutures [4, 5]. In particular, thermal extrusion process at high temperature (Fig. 1a), which is necessary to manufacture various biodegradable devices based on PLLA, maximizes inherent flaws of PLLA such as poor mechanical properties, matrix cracking, and thermal instability via random chain scission [6], depolymerisation [7] and intramolecular transesterification [7, 8]. Fig. 1b and c show the degradation mechanism of PLLA based on backbiting and hydrolytic degradations. The acidic byproducts generated in this reaction acted as a nucleophile in ester linkage and accelerated the degradation reaction of PLLA backbone. Moreover, the presence of moisture in PLLA accelerates the cleavage of the ester linkage with the acid and alcohol groups that induced a significant molecular weight reduction. In biomedical applications, the released acidic degradation products from PLLA matrix reduce the pH of implant environment and result in inflammatory reaction in the body [9].
Fig. 1

a Thermal extrusion process and b, c degradation mechanisms of PLLA

One of the most important disadvantages of PLLA is brittleness due to its semi-crystalline character, which can limit its applicability. Many papers have reported the PLLA blends with ductile and biodegradable polymers such as polyglycolic acid (PGA) [10, 11], polyamide 6 (PA6) [12] and poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) (PBSA) [13, 14]. Aliphatic polyester based on polycaprolactone such as poly(L-lactide-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) has been used to improve the processability and thermal stability of PLLA because PLCL has flexible characteristics, low melting temperature, and aliphatic chain of polycaprolactone segment. The PLLA blends with polycaprolactone based polyester exhibit remarkable increase in their elongation at break due to relative increase of the amorphous region compared with PLLA [1517].

Magnesium hydroxide, which is widely used as an antacid agent, is a basic inorganic compound with the chemical formula of hydrated Mg(OH)2. Mg(OH)2 is in vivo absorbable in the form of magnesium and hydroxide ions as well as biocompatible [18]. The magnesium ions can be interact with anionic compounds and neutralize the acidic degradation products of PLLA [19]. In addition, Mg(OH)2 also can be used to mechanically reinforce the PLLA matrix, which is a key factor resulting in effective improvement in mechanical properties [20].

In this work, the PLLA blends with PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives were developed by thermal processing to improve the flexibility and thermal stability of PLLA matrix and enhance the tensile strength of thermally-processed PLLA. The physic-mechanical properties of PLLA control and PLLA/PLCL blends were measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and universal testing machine (UTM), and their thermal properties were evaluated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The effect of Mg(OH)2 in PLLA and PLLA/PLCL matrix was determined by measuring molecular weight and mechanical properties such as tensile strength and elongation. The degradation study was performed, and the degraded samples were assessed by following pH change and calculating molecular weight reduction to evaluate the the neutralizing effect of Mg(OH)2.

Methods

Materials

Poly(L-lactide) raw material (PLLA, average Mw = 380 kDa) was supplied by Samyang Co. (Seoul, Korea). Poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL, average Mw = 380 kDa) composed with 50:50 or 75:25 ratio of L-lactide and ε-caprolactone units was obtained from DURECT Co. (Birmingham, AL, USA). Chloroform and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) were purchased by Baker Chemicals Inc. (Center Valley, PA, USA) and Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. All chemicals were reagent grade and used without further purification.

Fabrication of PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 blends

The PLLA, PLCL, and Mg(OH)2 were mixed by solvent casting method to form a homogenous mixture. First, PLLA pellets were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h to prevent hydrolysis caused by residual moisture and acidic monomer. Dried PLLA raw materials and PLCL (50:50 or 75:25, respectively) additives were dissolved in 80 mL of chloroform with different rations of PLLA and PLCL, which the total amount of solutes was 5 g in the solution. For Mg(OH)2 incorporated samples, 0.25 g of Mg(OH)2 powders were added into the above polymer solutions. The mixture was poured into the Teflon mold (100 × 90 × 15 mm3), and then the solvent was slowly evaporated at room temperature for 24 h. The film samples were dried under vacuum at 60 °C to remove the residual solvent. The homogeneously mixed composites based on PLLA were chopped up into small fragments under 5 mm, and then kept at room temperature in vacuo until thermal process. Pure PLLA fragments were also prepared using the same method. Table 1 lists the abbreviation and conditions of samples including raw PLLA, processed PLLA, PLLA/PLCL, PLLA/Mg(OH)2, and PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 blends.
Table 1

Various blend compositions of PLCL and Mg(OH)2 in PLLA

Abbreviation

PLLA

(wt%)

PLCL (50:50)

(wt%)

PLCL (75:25)

(wt%)

Mg(OH)2

(wt%)

Raw PLLA

100

-

-

-

Processed PLLA

100

-

-

-

PLLA95/PLCL5 (50:50)

95

5

-

-

PLLA90/PLCL10 (50:50)

90

10

-

-

PLLA85/PLCL15 (50:50)

85

15

-

-

PLLA80/PLCL20 (50:50)

80

20

-

-

PLLA95/PLCL5 (75:25)

95

-

5

-

PLLA90/PLCL10 (75:25)

90

-

10

-

PLLA85/PLCL15 (75:25)

85

-

15

-

PLLA80/PLCL20 (75:25)

80

-

20

-

PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5

90

-

10

5

The PLLA only, PLLA/PLCL, PLLA/Mg(OH)2, and PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 composites underwent the thermally melting and hot-pressing process using Carver Press 30-12H (Carver Inc., Wabash, IN, USA). Four grams of polymer mixture put on the hot-press plate, and the plate temperature was then raised to 190 °C. After melting time of 3 min, the pressure increased to about 7 tons and maintained for press time of 6 min. The dimension of compressively molded specimens was 150 × 150 mm2 and its thickness was 200 μm. All specimens were stored in vacuum oven.

Characterizations of PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 blends

To evaluate the effects of PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives on the prevention of the molecular weight (Mw) of PLLA during thermal processing, Mw of processed PLLA and PLLA blends was measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The sample was dissolved in chloroform (HPLC grade) at 3 mg/mL concentration, and then the polymer solutions were filtered with a 0.45 μm PTFE filter to remove dust and contaminants. The GPC measurements were performed on an equipment consisted of a Waters 515 HPLC pump, a Waters 717 plus auto sampler and a Waters 410 refractive index (RI) detector (Waters, USA) with KF 804 L and KF 803 (7 μm, 8 × 300 mm, Shodex, Japan) columns (molecular weight resolving range of 500–400,000 Da). The GPC columns were performed using chloroform as the eluent with flow rate of 1 mL/min, and Mw were calibrated with polystyrene standard.

The mechanical properties such as tensile strength and elongation were measured by a universal testing machine (UTM, Instron Co., USA) in accordance with ASTM standard D638. For dynamic tensile test, the processed PLLA and composites with PLLA and additives were prepared with dumbbell shaped specimens (45 × 6 × 2 mm3, length × width × thickness) cut by a punch of a compression-molding machine. All test samples were tested after 1 week to remove the internal stress. The specimens were carried out with crosshead speed of 4 mm/min till failure to determine the influence of additives in PLLA on mechanical property.

The thermal properties of processed PLLA and PLLA blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, TA Instrument, USA) and thermogravimetric analyser (TGA, TA Instruments, USA), respectively. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of samples was determined by using DSC analysis. The temperature scan was performed with a heating and cooling rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. The samples were heated from 30 to 210 °C, held for 1 min to erase thermal history effects and cooled to 30 °C, held for 1 min and then heated to 210 °C again for the second scan, which was used to determine the Tg. The effects of additives types and contents on the thermal stability were assessed through TGA. The melting (Tm) and crystallization (Tc) temperatures, in addition to the associated enthalpy of melting (∆Hm) were measured using a heating/cooling ramp from 20 to 600 °C. A heating rate of 10 °C/min was used under nitrogen atmosphere and at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. Dry sample weighing about 1 mg was used. The standard uncertainty of the sample mass measurement is ±1 %.

Degradation test

To study the degradation behavior including pH change, mass loss, and molecular weight reduction of PLLA and PLLA blends, four groups (PLLA, PLLA/PLCL, PLLA/Mg(OH)2, PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2) were prepared in replicate experiments (n = 20, each). Pre-weighted specimens (W 0 ) were immersed into 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) solution at 60 °C under accelerated weathering conditions [21, 22]. The pH of the PBS solution was monitored every 2 days by a pH meter (Hanna Instrument, USA). Temperature and pH of the PBS solution were monitored during the degradation period and they remained at 37 °C and 7.4, respectively.

The pH change, was measured at the predetermined time point (1, 3, 5, and 7 days) to confirm acidity of samples as well as the neutralization of lactic acids with Mg(OH)2. At time intervals, the specimens were accurately weighed after deionized water rinse and vacuum drying for 48 h (W t ) to determine the mass loss and the reduction of molecular weight. The residual weight percentage was calculated according to the following equation: Mass loss (%) = (W 0 W t )/W 0 × 100 [23]. The reduced molecular weight of degraded specimens (M t ) was estimated using GPC and compared with an initial molecular weight of samples (M 0 ). The reduction of molecular weight (%) was also calculated according to the following equation: Mw reduction (%) = (M 0 M t )/M 0 × 100.

Statistical analysis

The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The results obtained by ANOVA were carried out using origin programs. The significance level considered was 0.05 and data groups were different from others.

Results and Discussion

PLLA/PLCL blends

The molecular weight and reduction degree of thermally processed PLLA and PLLA/PLCL blends with different feed ratios were shown in Fig. 2. The molecular weight of processed PLLA rapidly decreased to 234,342 Da as compared with raw PLLA (414,256 Da), which is mainly caused by random scission to generate acidic oligomers and monomers under thermal processing [6]. These oligomers and monomers with carboxyl and hydroxyl end groups as nucleophiles could attack ester linkages on PLLA backbone via intermolecular transesterification and backbiting, and the decomposition of PLLA matrix was accelerated by increasing acidic byproducts and esterification reaction [24]. In contrast, the addition of PLCL (50:50 or 75:25) with increasing PLCL content (5–20 wt%) into PLLA matrix slightly increased the molecular weight of PLLA blends after thermal processing compared with processed PLLA (Fig. 2a and c). With reflecting these results, the reduction degree of molecular weight gradually decreased with increase in PLCL ratio of PLLA/PLCL blends (Fig. 2b and d). Especially, PLCL (50:50) was more effective than PLCL (75:25) on inhibition of molecular weight reduction. The increased proportion of ε-caprolactone in polymer blends tended to reduce the thermal degradation due to greater thermal stability of ε-caprolactone than that of lactic acid [25]. That is why aliphatic polycaprolactone block in PLCL has one ester linkage with hexanoate repeat unit, whereas polyester PLLA has two ester linkages within repeat unit. This result supposed that the thermal decomposition and formation of acidic byproducts of PLLA/PLCL blends occurred much less than only PLLA at high temperature, and the molecular weight reduction of PLLA/PLCL blends was consequently prevented.
Fig. 2

Molecular weight properties of PLLA blends with various a, b PLCL (50:50) and c, d PLCL (75:25) contents

The mechanical properties such as tensile strength and elongation of PLLA/PLCL blends with different PLCL contents were evaluated as compared with thermally processed PLLA as a control. Figure 3 showed that the processed PLLA has higher tensile strength than PLLA/PLCL blends, while the elongation at break of the processed PLLA is severely low compared with PLLA/PLCL blends. It also is observed that the tensile strength decreased, whereas elongation dramatically increased with increasing proportion of PLCL (50:50 or 75:25) in PLLA/PLCL blends. The PLLA exhibited tensile strength of 54.4 MPa. The tensile strength decreased to 24.6 and 44.2 MPa by blending 20 wt% of PLCL (50:50) and PLCL (75:25) in PLLA, respectively (Fig. 3a and c). The elongation of PLLA/PLCL (50:50) blends with different ratios in 95:5, 90:10, 85:15, and 80:20 was 4.8, 31.1, 158.7, and 160.4 %, respectively (Fig. 3b). In PLLA/PLCL (75:25) blends, the elongation increased from 6.4 to 48.8 % with increasing PLCL contents from 5 to 20 %, compared with PLLA (3.0 %) (Fig. 3d). The result demonstrated that PLCL as a plasticizer could improve the flexibility of PLLA but remarkably reduce the tensile strength. In particular, the tensile strength of PLLA/PLCL (50:50) was thoroughly reduced, which could be limited to the application being considered. On the other hands, PLCL (75:25) blended PLLA relatively exhibited similar tensile strength to only PLLA with high flexibility. It is well known that polycaprolactone is highly amorphous, imparting flexibility comparable to a semi-crystalline PLLA. In PLLA and PLCL blended matrix, the matrix became flexible with increasing proportion of polycaprolactone. The ratio between semi-crystalline PLLA and amorphous polycaprolactone is important for proper mechanical property, because the amorphous structure makes the matrix not only flexible but also weak. PLCL (50:50) is composed of twice more caprolactone content than that of PLCL (75:25). Therefore, the tensile strength of PLLA blending with PLCL (50:50) was lower than that of PLLA blending with PLCL (75:25). In mechanical properties results, the PLLA90/PLCL10 (50:50 and 75:25) exhibited to successfully prevent the molecular weight reduction and to properly enhance the flexibility of PLLA.
Fig. 3

Mechanical properties of PLLA blends with various a, b PLCL (50:50) and c, d PLCL (75:25) contents

The thermal analysis of PLLA/PLCL blends was identified by DSC and confirmed by TGA. Table 2 summarized the thermal characteristics including the glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and melting enthalpy (ΔHm) of processed PLLA and PLLA/PLCL blends, acquired from DSC in second heating scan. The results indicated that Tg and ΔHm of PLLA/PLCL (50:50 or 75:25) blends decreased with increasing PLCL content, an endothermic melting peak indicated around 177 °C. The values of Tg and ΔHm of PLLA were measured to be 61 °C and 52 J/g, respectively. Tg value not only decreased by adding PLCL but also gradually decreased with increasing PLCL content. Moreover, the value of ΔHm decreased from 52 to 28 and 34 J/g for PLCL (50:50) and PLCL (75:25) corresponding to PLCL content from 0 to 20 wt%, which clearly indicated the reduced PLLA crystallization with PLCL. Moreover, Tm value of PLLA slightly decreased with the addition of PLCL. As described above, the thermal properties such as Tg, ΔHm and Tm strongly influenced by polymer molecular structure [26]. In general, decreasing the crystalline of a semi-crystalline polymer is accompanied by decrease in modulus, stiffness, yield stress, melting point, Tg, and dimensional stability, and by increase in impact resistance, elongation, and thermal expansion [27]. These results in semi-crystalline PLLA/PLCL blends could be attributed to the decreasing crystalline of PLLA with addition of PLCL containing amorphous polycaprolactone black, as shown in Fig. 4. Although the crystalline domain imparted much mechanical strength and stability to the PLLA/PLCL matrix, the amorphous structure absorbs a substantial fraction of the applied strain energy, owing to its higher elastic compliance [28].
Table 2

Thermal properties of PLLA control and PLLA/PLCL blends

Material

Tg (°C)

Tm (°C)

ΔHm (J/g)

Raw PLLA

59

176

49

Processed PLLA

61

178

52

PLLA95/PLCL5 (50:50)

58

177

41

PLLA90/PLCL10 (50:50)

56

177

36

PLLA85/PLCL15 (50:50)

55

175

32

PLLA80/PLCL20 (50:50)

52

174

28

PLLA95/PLCL5 (75:25)

58

177

54

PLLA90/PLCL10 (75:25)

57

177

46

PLLA85/PLCL15 (75:25)

55

177

38

PLLA80/PLCL20 (75:25)

55

176

34

Tg: glass transition temperature; Tm: melt temperature; Δ Hm: heat of melting

Fig. 4

Illustration of the preparation of PLLA/PLCL (75:25) composite film with improved processibility

TGA was also carried out on the different formulations to determine the effect of PLCL 10 wt% (50:50 or 75:25) on the thermal stability of PLLA (Fig. 5). It revealed that the decomposition temperature of PLLA90/PLCL10 blends was slightly high compared to the processed PLLA control. The addition of PLCL (50:50 or 75:25) affected the thermal stability of PLLA at high temperature ranges over 290 °C. The thermal degradation of PLLA90/PLCL10 blends occurred through ester pyrolysis reaction and induced chain cleavages to be randomly distributed [29, 30]. Since the proton in the CH group of the main chain of PLLA is labile, it has been suggested that the proximity of this labile proton to the ester group affects the thermal sensitivity of the polymer. Thus, the PLLA blending with PLCL with one ester linkage per one repeating unit was more thermally stable than only PLLA with two ester linkage per one repeating unit. In addition, PLLA90/PLCL10 (50:50) has a relatively high thermal stability as compared with others due to the lower proportion of polylactide in whole matrix. Although flexibility and thermal properties of PLLA blending with PLCL (50:50) were better than that of PLLA/PLCL (75:25), its mechanical strength was severely poor for applying to a polymeric biomaterial in medical applications. In this regard, further study on PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 matrix will be carried out by using PLLA90/PLCL10 blends with PLCL ratio of 75:25 due to its proper mechanical property.
Fig. 5

The TGA thermograms of processed PLLA and PLLA blends: a Raw PLLA, b Processed PLLA, c PLLA90/PLCL10 (50:50), and d PLLA90/PLCL10 (75:25) blends

PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 blends

The PLCL (75:25) and Mg(OH)2 (coded to Mg) blended PLLA samples were fabricated by thermal processing. PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 composite was characterized and compared with thermally processed PLLA, PLLA90/PLCL10, and PLLA100/Mg5 samples. Figure 6a and b were observed that the thermal decomposition of PLLA was alleviated by adding Mg(OH)2 as well as PLCL. The molecular weight of PLLA100/Mg5 and PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 increased compared with processed PLLA, and thus the reduction degree greatly decreased, which indicated that Mg(OH)2 improved the thermal stability. Mg(OH)2 as a basic inorganic compound degraded as [Mg2+] and [OH]. One Mg2+ of Mg(OH)2 also needs two anionic compounds to neutralize the charge and thus binds to anionic terminal group of PLLA and/or acidic degradation product; [Mg2+] · 2[lactic acid–OH]. The [Mg2+] · 2[lactic acid–OH] form inactivates hydroxyl groups of PLLA and byproducts which are capable of backbiting reaction and hydrolysis of ester linkages incorporated into the polymer backbone [3134]. It seemed that the Mg(OH)2 in PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 matrix inhibited consecutive ester pyrolysis and thermal-hydrolysis reactions with binding anionic terminal group of polymer and acidic byproducts generated during thermal processing. However, the conclusive mechanism was not fully understood yet. The inorganic Mg(OH)2 particles slightly enhanced the tensile strength affected by molecular weight, but reduced the elongation at break due to poor interfacial adhesion, as shown in Fig. 6c. PLLA100/Mg5 matrix exhibited higher tensile strength than PLLA but still brittle fracture characteristics like PLLA. In PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 matrix, the tensile strength and flexibility appropriately increased due to Mg(OH)2 and PLCL, respectively, compared with PLLA control. Mg(OH)2 not only affected the molecular weight reduction and mechanical strength under thermal processing, but also alleviated reduced pH value and molecular weight during degradation.
Fig. 6

Effects of the additives on PLLA based composite films on a, b molecular weight and c tensile properties: A) processed PLLA, B) PLLA90/PLCL10, C) PLLA100/Mg5, and D) PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 blends (* p < 0.05)

Figure 7 displayed the results in accelerated degradation of PLLA, PLLA100/Mg5, PLLA90/PLCL10, and PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 blends in PBS (pH 7.4) at 60 °C for 14 days. As shown Fig. 7a, the pH values of media containing PLLA and PLLA90/PLCL10 samples decreased to 6.8 and 6.5, respectively because of the acidic byproducts of PLLA and PLCL. The lower pH value of the PLLA/PLCL degraded media depended on caprolactone segment, which was easily degenerated due to Tg value below 60 °C. Meanwhile, the Mg(OH)2-containing matrix such as PLLA100/Mg5 and PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 slightly compensated the pH as compared with PLLA control, corresponding to 7.1 in 14 days. For pH neutralization of the degradation medium, many researchers studied some inorganic compounds such as sodium bicarbonate and calcium carbonate and incorporated these inorganic compounds into the PLLA matrix to evaluate their effect on the degradation process [10, 35]. In particular, Mg(OH)2 particles can neutralize the acidic environment since the dehydrated magnesium ion can bind with two moles of anionic compounds [19]. The acidic degradation products of degraded PLLA and PLCL were sufficiently neutralized by Mg(OH)2 particles, and also the accelerated formation of degradation byproducts was prevented by binding of acidic terminal groups of PLLA and PLCL to Mg(OH)2.
Fig. 7

Degradation study of a changes of pH and b reduction of molecular weight with hydrolytic time: A) processed PLLA, B) PLLA90/PLCL10, C) PLLA100/Mg5, and D) PLLA90/PLCL10/Mg5 blends

The molecular weights of degraded samples were evaluated to confirm the effects of Mg(OH)2 on molecular weight reduction as well as pH balance (Fig. 7b). The PLLA only and PLCL90/PLCL10 blends almost degraded and their molecular weights were dropped to about 10 % for 14 days. On the other hand, the molecular weight of Mg(OH)2-containing blends slowly declined, and, in particular, PLLA100/Mg5 scarcely decomposed as compared with other groups due to higher Tg value of PLLA than that of PLLA90/PLCL10. During degradation, a large amount of the acidic degradation products were released, which usually resulted in a rapid decrease in the pH of the soaking medium [36]. The acidic byproduct reacted like a nucleophile to ester linkage of PLLA and PLCL backbones and then accelerated the decomposition of polymer chains. In PLLA blends with Mg(OH)2, the Mg(OH)2 hindered the accumulation of acidic byproducts and averted backbiting and intermolecular transesterification. These results demonstrated that the Mg(OH)2 affected the prevention of molecular weight reduction by neutralizing acidic substance.

Conclusions

The new PLLA blends with PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives successfully fabricated by thermal processing, and the effects of PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives on physico-chemical and thermal properties under thermal decomposition of PLLA matrix were assessed using various analyses. With increasing the amount of PLCL, the PLLA/PLCL blends exhibited the alleviation of molecular weight reduction and the improvement of flexibility compared with thermally processed PLLA control. The PLLA/PLCL blends with increasing proportion of polycaprolactone depicted proper thermal stability as well as mechanical strength including tensile strength and elongation. In Mg(OH)2-containing matrix, the molecular reduction and mechanical strength were dramatically improved because the dehydrated magnesium ion inhibited the decomposition of polyester substrate by counteracting acidic compounds, which is a kind of nucleophile at ester linkage. In particular, the Mg(OH)2 in matrix certainly neutralized the acidic byproducts involved during polyester degradation, that caused the acid-induced inflammatory reaction in vivo. The obtained results suggested that PLCL and Mg(OH)2 additives were effective to enhance flexibility and control degradation behavior of biodegradable PLLA matrix, and therefore the PLLA/PLCL/Mg(OH)2 composites have the potential as a material for bio-absorbable biomedical devices such as implants and stents.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Pioneer Research Center Program (2014M3C1A3056052) and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program (2014M3A9D3033887) through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) and Core Material Development Program (10048019) funded by Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Republic of Korea.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Biomaterials, Korea Institute of Science and Technology
(2)
Department of Biological Science, Korea University
(3)
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Ray SS, Okamoto M. Biodegradable polylactide and its nanocomposites: opening a new dimension for plastics and composites. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2003;24:815–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Z, Feng S-S. The drug encapsulation efficiency, in vitro drug release, cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded poly (lactide)–tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4025–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rasal RM, Hirt DE. Micropatterning of covalently attached biotin on poly (lactic acid) film surfaces. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9:989–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Auras R, Harte B, Selke S. An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci. 2004;4:835–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Vink ET, Rabago KR, Glassner DA, Gruber PR. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab. 2003;80:403–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yu H, Huang N, Wang C, Tang Z. Modeling of poly (L‐lactide) thermal degradation: Theoretical prediction of molecular weight and polydispersity index. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;88:2557–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jamshidi K, Hyon S-H, Ikada Y. Thermal characterization of polylactides. Polymer. 1988;29:2229–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kopinke F-D, Remmler M, Mackenzie K, Möder M, Wachsen O. Thermal decomposition of biodegradable polyesters—II. Poly (lactic acid). Polym Degrad Stab. 1996;53:329–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Amid P. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Agrawal CM, Athanasiou KA. Technique to control pH in vicinity of biodegrading PLA-PGA implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38:105–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Linhart W, Peters F, Lehmann W, Schwarz K, Schilling AF, Amling M, et al. Biologically and chemically optimized composites of carbonated apatite and polyglycolide as bone substitution materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:162–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Khankrua R, Pivsa-Art S, Hiroyuki H, Suttiruengwong S. Effect of chain extenders on thermal and mechanical properties of poly (lactic acid) at high processing temperatures: Potential application in PLA/Polyamide 6 blend. Polym Degrad Stab. 2014;108:232–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee S, Lee JW. Characterization and processing of biodegradable polymer blends of poly (lactic acid) with poly (butylene succinate adipate). Korea Aust Rheol J. 2005;17:71–7.Google Scholar
  14. Park JW, Im SS. Phase behavior and morphology in blends of poly (L‐lactic acid) and poly (butylene succinate). J Appl Polym Sci. 2002;86:647–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Q, Yoon J-S, Chen G-X. Thermal and biodegradable properties of poly (L-lactide)/poly (ε-Caprolactone) compounded with functionalized organoclay. J Polym Environ. 2011;19:59–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang L, Ma W, Gross R, McCarthy S. Reactive compatibilization of biodegradable blends of poly (lactic acid) and poly (ε-caprolactone). Polym Degrad Stab. 1998;59:161–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wu D, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Yu W. Selective localization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in poly (ε-caprolactone)/polylactide blend. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:417–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu X-N, Li S-S, Li X-M, Fan Y-B. Magnesium based degradable biomaterials: A review. Front Mater Sci. 2014;8:200–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kum CH, Cho Y, Joung YK, Choi J, Park K, Seo SH, et al. Biodegradable poly (l-lactide) composites by oligolactide-grafted magnesium hydroxide for mechanical reinforcement and reduced inflammation. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1:2764–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wen W, Luo B, Qin X, Li C, Liu M, Ding S, et al. Strengthening and toughening of poly (L-lactide) composites by surface modified MgO whiskers. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;332:215–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaci M, Benhamida A, Zaidi L, Touati N, Remili C. Photodegradation of Poly (Lactic Acid)/Organo-Modified Clay Nanocomposites under Natural Weathering Exposure. Ecosustainable Polymer Nanomaterials for Food Packaging: Innovative Solutions, Characterization Needs, Safety and Environmental Issues. 2013: 281Google Scholar
  22. Scoponi M, Pradella F, Kaczmarek H, Amadelli R, Carassiti V. A reappraisal of the photo-oxidation mechanism at short and long wavelengths for poly (2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide). Polymer. 1996;37:903–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Li AD, Sun Z, Zhou M, Xu X, Ma J, Zheng W, et al. Electrospun Chitosan-graft-PLGA nanofibres with significantly enhanced hydrophilicity and improved mechanical property. Colloids Surf B. 2013;102:674–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Coltelli M-B, Toncelli C, Ciardelli F, Bronco S. Compatible blends of biorelated polyesters through catalytic transesterification in the melt. Polym Degrad Stab. 2011;96:982–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sivalingam G, Karthik R, Madras G. Kinetics of thermal degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone). J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2003;70:631–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Douglas JF. A dynamic measure of order in structural glasses. Comput Mater Sci. 1995;4:292–308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Seidel A. Processing and finishing of polymeric materials Vol. 2. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Lim L-T, Auras R, Rubino M. Processing technologies for poly (lactic acid). Prog Polym Sci. 2008;33:820–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Draye A-C, Persenaire O, Brožek J, Roda J, Košek T, Dubois P. Thermogravimetric analysis of poly (ε-caprolactam) and poly [(ε-caprolactam)-co-(ε-caprolactone)] polymers. Polymer. 2001;42:8325–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Persenaire O, Alexandre M, Degée P, Dubois P. Mechanisms and kinetics of thermal degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone). Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:288–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EH. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:839–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutmacher DW. Biomaterials offer cancer research the third dimension. Nat Mater. 2010;9:90–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. DesRochers TM, Palma E, Kaplan DL. Tissue-engineered kidney disease models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;69:67–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Garrod M, San Chau DY. An Overview of Tissue Engineering as an Alternative for Toxicity Assessment. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;19:31–71.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Meer S, De Wijn J, Wolke J. The influence of basic filler materials on the degradation of amorphous D-and L-lactide copolymer. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1996;7:359–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibbons D. Tissue response to resorbable synthetic polymers. Degradation phenomena on polymeric biomaterials: Springer; 1992. p. 97–105.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kang et al. 2016

Advertisement