From: Recent updates for biomaterials used in total hip arthroplasty
Bearing Surface | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
MoP Articulation | ∙ Good long term results in elderly patients | ∙ Higher rate of liner wear |
∙ Newly materials - XLPE, Antioxidant doped PE | ∙ PE liner wear debris generated the occurrence of osteolysis | |
∙ Newly materials do not have long term results | ||
MoM Articulation | ∙ Reduction in wear | ∙ Bone and soft tissue necrosis with pseudotumor formation |
∙ Improvement of range of movement | ∙ Cobalt and chromium ions can affect the body | |
∙ Lower dislocation rate | ∙ Relatively high rate of osteolysis and implant failure | |
∙ Good clinical results in small head MoM | ∙ Withdrawal of large head MoM | |
CoC Articulation | ∙ Lower wear rate | ∙ Ceramic fracture |
∙ Lower osteolysis | ∙ Squeaking noise | |
∙ Very higher survivor rate in long term results | ||
∙ Harmless wear particle to human body | ||
CoP Articulation | ∙ Ceramic surfaces advantages + PE surfaces advantages | ∙ Alumina head fracture |
∙ Lower wear rate | ∙ Metal transfer |